The MBP 16 will then increase the fans speed to the maximum value for a few minutes, which results in loud 55.6 dB(A). We had to start the stress test (CB R23 and 3DMark Wildlife Extreme) in the normal mode and switched to the performance mode after a couple of minutes.
![macbook g4 ssd macbook g4 ssd](https://forums.macrumors.com/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fs32.postimg.org%2Fo2qw2jer9%2FHPIM3915.jpg)
However, these maximum speeds are pretty theoretical, because there was only one scenario where we could reach the maximum speed.
Macbook g4 ssd pro#
The fans of the MacBook Pro 16 M1 Max can reach a higher maximum speed (5348 rpm on the left side and 5776 rpm on the right side) compared to the M1 Pro unit (42 rpm, respectively). It will only get louder when you start to stress the 32 GPU cores. Pure CPU load will result in the lowest fan speed (1600 rpm), which is hardly audible at all. The MacBook Pro 16 with the M1 Max processor is silent while idling and during light workloads, because the fans are turned off and there are no other electronic noises (like coil whine), either. However, there is once again the problem that it is an emulated title. Our gaming benchmarks once again show an advantage of around 70-80 percent over the M1 Pro and the performance in Shadow of the Tomb Raider is roughly comparable to fast versions of the GeForce RTX 3060. There are currently only a few native titles and some can be emulated.
![macbook g4 ssd macbook g4 ssd](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/RjoAAOSwnRJbijTW/s-l1600.jpg)
You can play games on the MacBook Pro 16, but the number of available games is the big limitation. The graphics performance is also completely stable on battery power. The Wild Life Extreme Unlimited benchmark, which is running natively on the MacBook, shows comparable performance figures to the GeForce RTX 3070, even though the M1 Max does not even require half of the power. We can determine a maximum consumption of 44W for the GPU during the benchmarks, and the results are much better compared to the M1 Pro with 16 GPU cores with an advantage between 60 up to 95 percent. The high-end version of the MacBook with the fastest M1 Max is equipped with four GPU clusters and eight cores each. These will be much faster in practice, but we cannot determine the exact performance advantage. These are emulated via Rosetta 2, and it works, but the performance is noticeably worse compared to the native versions. The M1 Max performs noticeably better than the M1 Pro, but you should be a bit cautious with the results, since the benchmarks are only compatible with the Intel versions of the applications. We also performed the two PugetBench tests for Adobe Photoshop as well as Adobe Premiere Pro. The BlackMagic RAW Speed Test shows the advantage of the larger cache, because the CPU test shows a small advantage of 7 percent. This is also supported by the cross-system benchmark CrossMark, where the two devices are very similar. During everyday tasks or when you only stress the CPU, you will not notice a difference to the entry-level unit with the M1 Pro though. I posted more info in another similar topic (including a product review for the mSATA adapter), a few months ago.It is not surprising that the high-end SKU of the MacBook is obviously a very powerful and immensely responsive laptop. 128GB is the maximum for my old PowerBook, so it was a good deal (about $40 at that time). It was used and the seller had larger number, so I figured they were "pulls" from laptops that were recycled or upgraded to higher storage. I bought the mSATA card (Samsung branded) on eBay. The total cost was about $55, probably even less expensive now. That makes sense, because an mSATA card (unlike an SD card) is designed to be a computer drive (not media storage). The mSATA card (plus adapter) is noticeably faster, when doing things that require concentrated disk access, like when starting up. Then, I replaced it with a 128GB mSATA card on a different adapter I used it that way for about a year or so.
Macbook g4 ssd mac#
I had previously used that same SDXC card (Sony branded) with my 2011 Mac mini (in its high-speed SD card slot), as an alternate startup disk for testing purposes. First, I used a physically tiny SDXC card (32GB) on an adapter, and that worked surprisingly well.
![macbook g4 ssd macbook g4 ssd](https://i5.walmartimages.com/asr/3681d90f-f6d6-462d-b5e0-b1a72542aca8_1.197da4256d77411917b17dc991a5565f.jpeg)
I replaced the hard drive in my even older PowerBook ("Pismo") with solid state storage. It does make the PowerBook more quiet, and it produces less heat, so its fans may come on less often (making it even more quiet). It probably won't affect overall performance very much.